Bring us your AI-built prototype.
You built it in Lovable, Bolt, v0, Cursor or Replit and it almost works. We read what it proves, what it hides and what should happen next, then build the real system: scope, security, data, testing, support.
The prototype is a better brief. We build the product it describes.
A prototype built with an AI tool is the most useful brief a business has ever brought us. It shows the screens, the flow and the words. It also skips the parts that make software safe to run: accounts, permissions, data, payments, errors, hosting.
The prototype review reads both. In a week you get a written scope: what the prototype proves, what it hides, the risks, a build path and a quote. Ask for a quote for the review before we start.
Then we build the real system, with the prototype as the reference, and support it after launch. You keep working in your tool if you like; we tell you where that stops being safe. Our guide to working with a digital agency explains how the prototype becomes a scope.
It works on your laptop. Production is a different place.
Prototypes are built to show, not to run. The AI tool makes the happy path look finished and leaves the rest for later: who may see what, what happens when a payment fails, where the data lives, who gets the error at 2 a.m.
None of that is a reason to throw the prototype away. It is the reason to read it properly before spending real money. The review is where most of the savings happen: what to keep, what to rebuild, what to drop.
We have done this for publishers and brokerages that came with half-built systems. The pattern is the same at any size.
After the review, one of three paths.
Most prototypes land in one of these. The review tells you which, with a quote for each.
Rebuild from the reference
Stop here
Support
Read it. Scope it. Build the real one. Support it.
We start by reading the prototype as a brief and as code, then write down what it proves, what it hides and what it should become.
Send the link
The prototype's URL and, if you have it, the code. A short form asks what it is for and who will use it.
The review
A week. We use it as a user, read it as engineers, and list what holds, what hides and what it would take.
The scope document
Written, with a build path in phases and a quote per phase. We walk through it on a call.
Build, phase by phase
Finish or rebuild, with the prototype as the reference. Accounts, data, permissions, payments, errors, hosting done properly.
Launch
Tested, hosted where it makes sense, documented, yours.
Support
A monthly plan with a named engineer, so the system keeps working after the launch week.
From the people who wrote the vibe-coding series.
We read prototypes for a living
Six articles on what AI-built prototypes prove and hide. The review applies them to yours.
Quote agreed, one week
The review has an agreed quote and a deadline before you commit to anything else.
Keep what works
We do not rebuild for the sake of it. If the stack holds, we finish it; if it does not, the prototype becomes the spec.
Senior engineers, Reston VA
The people who review the prototype build the product. Since 2012, for USA TODAY, Century 21 New Millennium and founders across the DC metro.
Supported after launch
We build systems we are willing to support. A named engineer stays on the product after the launch.
What clients say.
What the prototype review and the build cover.
A practical checklist of what RTW can help with.
Review / one week
Scope / document
Build / engineering
Launch / handover
Support / post-launch
Honest / answers
Good fit when the prototype already convinced someone.
RTW is a good fit when a prototype has shown the idea to users, a partner or a boss and the next question is “what does it take to run this for real?”
It is not a good fit when the prototype has not been shown to anyone yet. Show it first; the review is better with their reactions in it.
- You built it in Lovable, Bolt, v0, Cursor or Replit and it almost works
- Users like it and you are afraid to put real data in it
- The AI tool stopped being able to fix what it broke
- You need accounts, payments or permissions and the tool's version feels unsafe
- An investor, partner or client asked “is this production-ready?”
- You want a quote for finishing it before you spend more
- You want someone to support it after launch
Straight answers to the questions we usually hear first.
Will you just tell us to rebuild everything?
Can we keep working in the tool?
Is our code safe to show you?
How much does finishing cost?
What if it is not worth finishing?
Questions from the intake conversations.
01 Which tools do you review?
02 What do we get from the prototype review?
03 How much does the review cost?
04 Who owns the code?
05 Can we keep using the AI tool while you build?
06 What does 'production-ready' mean?
07 How long does the build take?
08 Do you support it after launch?
09 Do you work remotely?
Send the link. We'll tell you what it proves and what it hides.
A one-week review of your AI-built prototype: what holds, what is missing, the risks, and a quoted path to a system you can run.