One agent, one process, clear limits.
An AI agent works through a sequence of tasks: gathering information, using connected tools, taking permitted actions toward a goal. We set one up for one well-defined workflow, with the actions it may take written down and your team reviewing where it matters.
An agent that finishes a job, inside limits you can read.
Our work as an AI agent development company starts with the difference: a workflow follows steps you drew. An agent is given a goal and a set of tools, and works out the steps itself: it reads the new inquiry, looks the company up, checks the calendar, drafts the reply, creates the task, and escalates when something does not fit.
That freedom is the point and the risk. So we build agents for one well-defined process, with a written list of the actions it may take, the ones it must ask about, and the ones it may never take.
The agent runs inside the tools you already use. Your team sees its work as drafts, tasks and a log, and reviews the decisions you said need a person.
Most businesses need a workflow. Some need an agent. We tell you which.
If the steps are always the same, a workflow is cheaper, faster to build and easier to trust. An agent earns its place when the steps depend on what it finds: which documents are missing, what the customer actually asked, what the calendar allows.
The honest answer on the review call is often "a workflow with one AI step". We say that, because an agent that was not needed is a system nobody wants to maintain. If the job is drafting or finding answers for your team, see AI Integrations & Copilots.
When an agent is the right shape, the work is in the limits: what it may do, what it must ask, how you see what it did. That is what we design first.
Four agents with a clear job.
Each of these has a goal in one sentence, a short list of tools, and actions that are safe to take alone. That is what makes them buildable in weeks.
The document collector
The support triage agent
The research agent
Define the limits first. Then the agent. Then the month of proof.
We start by writing the agent's contract: its goal, its tools, the actions it may take alone, the ones it must ask about, and how you see what it did. For ongoing maintenance after launch, see Application Support.
Process review
A 30-minute call. You describe the job; we tell you whether it wants an agent, a workflow, or neither.
The agent's contract
A one-page document: the goal, the tools, the permitted actions, the actions that need a person, the stop conditions, the agreed quote.
Build and connect
We build the agent on the model we agree on and connect it to your CRM, inbox, calendar, forms or sheets. Every action is logged.
Prove it on real cases
The agent runs on real work for two weeks with your team reviewing every escalation and a sample of everything else.
Launch
Live, with the review points you chose. You own the agent, its contract and its documentation.
Measure for a month
Response time, hours saved, escalations, errors. Then we decide together what to widen and what to leave alone.
Agents with human oversight, from people who will support them.
Limits before autonomy
We write what the agent may do before we write the agent. The contract is yours to read and change.
One process, measured
A single agent with a job you can measure, not a platform. The second agent comes after the first has run for a month.
Your tools, your data
The agent reads and writes through the tools you already use, with access scoped to the job and logs you can open.
Senior engineers, Reston VA
The people who scope the agent build it and answer for it. Since 2012, for USA TODAY, Century 21 New Millennium and businesses across the DC metro.
Supported after launch
Agents drift as the business changes. A support plan with a named engineer keeps the contract and the behavior in line.
What clients say.
What we can build into an AI agent.
A practical checklist of what RTW can help with.
Review / discovery
Contract / limits
Build / engineering
Prove / quality
Launch / handover
Support / post-launch
Good fit when the next step depends on what the agent finds.
RTW is a good fit when one process has a clear goal, a handful of tools, and actions that are safe to take alone, with a person available for the rest.
It is not a good fit when the goal is "an AI that runs the business", or when the actions cannot be made safe. We say so on the review call.
- New inquiries need looking up, qualifying and routing before anyone replies
- Onboarding needs documents collected and checked from several people
- Support requests need classifying and drafting before a person answers
- Research tasks eat an afternoon every week
- A no-code "agent" was tried and nobody could tell what it did
- You want the limits written down before anything runs
- You want one agent measured, not a platform promised
Straight answers to the questions we usually hear first.
Is an agent safe to let loose on our customers?
How is this different from a workflow?
What does it cost to run?
What if it makes a bad call?
Who owns the agent?
Questions from the intake conversations.
01 What does an AI agent actually do in a small business?
02 What must an agent not do?
03 Which tools can the agent use?
04 Do we need a workflow or an agent?
05 How long does it take?
06 How much does it cost?
07 What happens when the agent is unsure?
08 Which AI models do you use?
09 Do you work remotely?
Bring us one process. We'll tell you if it wants an agent.
A 30-minute review: the goal, the tools, what could run alone, what must stay with a person, and what a first agent would cost.